Aristotle vs. Martin Luther King Jr essays

Aristotle vs. Martin Luther King Jr essays For a common person, it is a big enough task to determine what is true for themselves and their surroundings. However, to truly live a good life, they must choose a path based on self-knowledge and truth. Since no one path is better than the other, it is important to follow different paths and assess each step of the journey to seek truth and self-awareness. If the individual does not feel a connection between that truth and the self, they should consider a different path. Through instincts and reasoning are guides for the common people to achieve the good life. However, philosophers like Aristotle and a more contemporary Martin Luther King Jr must be aware of the deepest possible meanings of all known truths and not simply just choose one path since each path offers different thoughts. Despite the fact that Aristotle and Martin Luther King Jrs lived during different periods, their ideas and teachings towards achieving a good life are quite comparable, but of course, along with some differences. For the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, a person achieved the good life the best possible life for mankind in accordance with his nature- only as part of a political state. He believed that all existing things have a purpose and that their purpose constitutes their good. He is not concerned with individual good but with the good for all humans. He named this good eudaimonia, which is translated as happiness. This word includes both the notion of behaving well and the notion of faring well, meaning being a good person and doing well in life. Like the Greek analogy, happiness is the goodness of persons soul as health is the goodness of a persons body . In Politics, Aristotle suggests that the aim of government is to aid its citizens in the realization of the good life. He stressed that the need for human beings to live in societies in order to become self-fulfilled is something not possi...

Free Essays on Analytical Essay

The question Putnam poses in reference to social isolation and social involvement is a very debatable topic in today’s society (Burns, 12). Today there is an abundant and growing presence of social isolation in terms of social capital. Social capital is defined as participation in voluntary associations that reinforce democratic and civic habits of discussion, compromise, and respect for differences (Burns, 10). Americans have recently shown a decline in their involvement in various activities, which would be beneficial as a group, not just on a personal level. According to S. Cohen & Wills when citizens are involved in civic life, their schools run more efficiently, their politicians are more open for response, and their streets become safer. The lower the crime rates the more cohesive the community (FBI/ UCR, 1995). Social capital has proven to be an empirical concept measured on certain variables. These variables include: community participation, proactively in a social context, feeling safe and trusting, connecting with neighbors, family and friend connections, diversity tolerance, valuing life, and work connections (Bullen and Onyx, 1998). On an individual basis, social isolation can be associated with poor quality of life and deteriorating physical and psychological health ( S. Cohen & Wills). A possible source of the lack of involvement may be a product of the uprise of technology such as the Internet. Scholars have been arguing that the Internet is causing social isolation and is cutting them off from the well-needed social relationships. The Internet also proved to provide an increase in depression and loneliness (Stoll, 1995; Turkle, 1996). Although changes in labor force participation of women and divorces account for some of the decline in social participation and an increase of depression since the 1960’s, technological change played a major role. Television, an earlier technology like the internet in some ways, r... Free Essays on Analytical Essay Free Essays on Analytical Essay The question Putnam poses in reference to social isolation and social involvement is a very debatable topic in today’s society (Burns, 12). Today there is an abundant and growing presence of social isolation in terms of social capital. Social capital is defined as participation in voluntary associations that reinforce democratic and civic habits of discussion, compromise, and respect for differences (Burns, 10). Americans have recently shown a decline in their involvement in various activities, which would be beneficial as a group, not just on a personal level. According to S. Cohen & Wills when citizens are involved in civic life, their schools run more efficiently, their politicians are more open for response, and their streets become safer. The lower the crime rates the more cohesive the community (FBI/ UCR, 1995). Social capital has proven to be an empirical concept measured on certain variables. These variables include: community participation, proactively in a social context, feeling safe and trusting, connecting with neighbors, family and friend connections, diversity tolerance, valuing life, and work connections (Bullen and Onyx, 1998). On an individual basis, social isolation can be associated with poor quality of life and deteriorating physical and psychological health ( S. Cohen & Wills). A possible source of the lack of involvement may be a product of the uprise of technology such as the Internet. Scholars have been arguing that the Internet is causing social isolation and is cutting them off from the well-needed social relationships. The Internet also proved to provide an increase in depression and loneliness (Stoll, 1995; Turkle, 1996). Although changes in labor force participation of women and divorces account for some of the decline in social participation and an increase of depression since the 1960’s, technological change played a major role. Television, an earlier technology like the internet in some ways, r...

Employment flexibility - Australian perspective Essay

Employment flexibility - Australian perspective - Essay Example It is mainly due to the changing economic conditions and business scenario of the entire globe. By doing so, the organization might cope-up with the changing market conditions and requirements of the customers. As a result, the efficiency and effectiveness of the organization enhances resulting in amplification of its brand image and reputation in the market among others. Other than this, the demand and requirements of the products increased to a significant extent resulting in enhancement of its brand equity and profit margin in the entire market among other competitors operating in similar field. However, in order to increase the rate of competitiveness in global perspectives, maximum extent of the organizations desires to implement the concept of flexibility in the employment conditions of the workers. This helps the employees to avail the facility of varied working schedules and timings resulting in improvement of the morale and performance level of the employees. As a result, th e level of productivity of the workers and organization enhanced to a considerable extent thereby enhancing its level of sustainability in this competitive scenario among other rival entrants. Thus, this concept proved extremely effective for the organizations and the workers operating in Australian market (Macdonalds, 2003). What Is Flexibility In Employment Mean? According to Reilly (2001), flexibility in working conditions means that getting adjusted to the economic conditions and also the working schedules so as to increase the productivity and efficiency of the organizations in the market among others. Not only this, it might also prove effective for the employees to increase their morale and dedication towards work resulting in amplification of their performance in the organization. Moreover, this concept is appreciated both by the management as well as the employees of the organization as it highlighted the outcomes-oriented approach. This means that time is not the prime con straint, but outcome or productivity is the prime thing. The employee had to offer the amount of work allotted to him or her in his preferred or ideal time so as to improve their level of performance and motivation as well. Thus, the National Qualification Framework (NQF) offered more concentration over outcome-oriented approach rather than time-control approach in Australian organizations (Reilly, 2001). Thus, this approach is highly appreciated by both the employers and the employees of the Australian organization as compared to others. Literature review According to Auer & Cazes (2003), employment flexibility is one of the innovative concept emerged in the recent age. The prime reason for the introduction of this concept is to motivate both the employees and the employer of the organization. The main aim of the employer of any organization in this age is to enhance its range of profit thereby fulfilling both the basic and psychological needs of the employees. Only then, the emplo yees would become satisfied and as a result their level of performance and inner dedication might improve. Due to which, the level of efficiency and devotion towards the responsibilities of the work might enhance resulting in fulfilment of the common objective of the organization. Side by side, by observing the dedication level of the senior employees, the juniors might also adopt the similar working behaviour and culture resulting in enhancement of the total sales and ROI of the Australian organization in the entire globe among other rivals (Government of